← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Intermediate

IntermediatePending
Sep 2026

Summary

Did the Google onsite for a software engineering role, two coding rounds back to back. First one went fine after a shaky start, second one was rough in a way that's hard to shake off.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

A DSA problem where the optimal approach involved a classic data structure or algorithmic pattern (first coding round).

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Came up with the right idea almost immediately, then talked myself out of it.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then identify the underlying pattern (e.g., sliding window, two pointers, BFS/DFS, dynamic programming) that maps to a classic data structure or algorithm. Explain the brute-force approach and its complexity, then derive the optimal solution by optimizing with the appropriate data structure, and finally walk through a concrete example to validate correctness.

Pro tip: Verbalize your thought process and trade-offs clearly—Google interviewers evaluate your problem-solving approach and communication as much as the final code. If you recognize the pattern early, state it explicitly and explain why it fits, then discuss alternative approaches and their complexities before committing to code.

1. Understand and Clarify

Restate the problem in your own words, ask clarifying questions about input size, constraints, and edge cases, and confirm expected output format.

2. Identify Pattern and Brute Force

Recognize the classic data structure or algorithmic pattern (e.g., hash map, heap, BFS) and describe a simple brute-force solution with its time and space complexity.

3. Optimize with Data Structure

Explain how the chosen data structure or pattern improves the brute-force approach, derive the optimal time and space complexity, and justify why it's optimal.

4. Walk Through Example

Trace the algorithm on a small but representative example, including edge cases, to demonstrate correctness and catch any logical flaws.

5. Code and Test

Write clean, modular code with meaningful variable names, then mentally test or dry-run with additional cases to ensure it handles all scenarios.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time and space complexity analysis for both brute-force and optimal solutions
  • Why the chosen data structure (e.g., hash map, heap, stack) is appropriate for the problem
  • Edge cases such as empty input, single element, duplicates, or large inputs
  • Trade-offs between different approaches (e.g., sorting vs. hashing, BFS vs. DFS)
  • Correctness argument or invariant that guarantees the algorithm works
  • Potential follow-up optimizations or variations if constraints change

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

A DSA problem requiring a Trie-based solution (second coding round).

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Interviewer dropped the problem statement in chat and just...

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the problem requirements and constraints, then propose a Trie-based solution, explaining how it efficiently handles prefix-based operations. Discuss trade-offs between Trie and alternatives, and walk through the implementation and complexity analysis.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of memory optimizations for Tries (e.g., using arrays vs. hash maps for children) and mention real-world applications like autocomplete to show practical understanding.

1. Understand the Problem

Ask clarifying questions to confirm input types, expected operations (insert, search, prefix matching), and constraints like alphabet size and memory limits.

2. Propose Trie Solution

Explain why a Trie is suitable: it provides O(L) operations for length-L strings and naturally supports prefix queries. Outline the node structure and basic operations.

3. Discuss Trade-offs

Compare Trie with alternatives like hash tables or sorted arrays, highlighting time/space trade-offs. Mention scenarios where Trie is preferable.

4. Implement and Analyze

Write clean code for the Trie operations, then analyze time and space complexity. Discuss potential optimizations like compressed Tries or using arrays for fixed alphabets.

5. Test and Validate

Walk through test cases including edge cases (empty string, long strings, shared prefixes) to ensure correctness and efficiency.

Key Points to Mention

  • Trie node structure with children mapping and end-of-word flag
  • Time complexity: O(L) for insert/search/prefix, where L is word length
  • Space complexity: O(N*L*alphabet_size) worst-case, but can be optimized
  • Trade-offs: Tries vs. hash tables (prefix queries, memory overhead)
  • Optimizations: using arrays for fixed alphabets, compressed Tries, or ternary search trees
  • Real-world applications: autocomplete, spell checkers, IP routing

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.