← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Apr 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round, one problem about calculating total file system size from a nested object structure. Pretty straightforward recursion but the follow-up on optimization is where it gets interesting.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

You're given a nested object representing a file system. Each object has a class (either 'file' or 'directory'), a size if it's a file, and a contains list if it's a directory. Write a function that returns the total size of the entire structure.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Recursion is pretty obvious once you see the structure, so I got through the core solution without too much trouble.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the input structure and edge cases, then propose a recursive depth-first traversal that sums file sizes and recurses into directories. Discuss iterative alternatives and complexity before writing clean code.

Pro tip: Mention that recursion depth could be an issue for very deep file systems and offer an iterative stack-based solution as a follow-up to show you think about production constraints.

1. Clarify the problem

Ask about input format, whether sizes are integers, and if the structure can be empty or have missing fields. Confirm expected output type.

2. Outline the approach

Explain that you'll traverse the tree recursively: if the node is a file, return its size; if it's a directory, sum the results of recursively processing each item in its contains list.

3. Analyze complexity

State that time complexity is O(n) where n is the total number of nodes, and space complexity is O(d) for recursion depth (or O(n) worst case).

4. Write the code

Implement the recursive function in a clean, readable manner, handling edge cases like empty directories and missing fields.

5. Test and discuss alternatives

Walk through a small example, then mention iterative DFS/BFS with a stack/queue as an alternative to avoid recursion limits.

Key Points to Mention

  • Recursive depth-first traversal
  • Base case: file returns its size
  • Recursive case: directory sums children
  • Time complexity O(n), space O(d) for recursion stack
  • Edge cases: empty directory, missing size, deep nesting
  • Iterative alternative using explicit stack to avoid stack overflow

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

How would you optimize the computation speed for this file system size calculation?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where I got a bit vague.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints and the current implementation to identify bottlenecks. Then propose a combination of algorithmic improvements (e.g., using efficient data structures, parallelization) and system-level optimizations (e.g., caching, I/O reduction), while discussing trade-offs.

Pro tip: Quantify the impact of each optimization with back-of-the-envelope calculations and mention how you would measure performance (e.g., profiling) to validate improvements.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about the file system size, expected growth, hardware limitations, and whether the calculation is batch or real-time. This ensures you optimize for the right scenario.

2. Identify bottlenecks

Analyze the current algorithm and system calls to find CPU, I/O, or memory bottlenecks. Consider using profiling tools to pinpoint hotspots.

3. Propose algorithmic optimizations

Suggest improvements like using a more efficient traversal (e.g., iterative instead of recursive), parallelizing directory scans, or employing a map-reduce approach for distributed file systems.

4. Propose system-level optimizations

Discuss caching metadata, reducing system calls (e.g., using bulk stat), leveraging asynchronous I/O, or using in-memory data structures to avoid repeated disk access.

5. Evaluate trade-offs and measure

Compare options based on complexity, scalability, and resource usage. Explain how you would benchmark and iterate to ensure the optimization meets performance goals.

Key Points to Mention

  • Algorithmic complexity (e.g., O(n) vs O(n log n)) and data structures (e.g., hash maps for deduplication)
  • Parallelization and concurrency (e.g., using threads, multiprocessing, or distributed computing)
  • Caching and memoization to avoid redundant computations
  • I/O optimization (e.g., batch system calls, asynchronous I/O, memory-mapped files)
  • Trade-offs between speed, memory usage, and code complexity
  • Profiling and benchmarking to validate optimizations

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.