← Bloomberg Interview Insights
I started with the brute force and talked through it fine: iterate every cell, count houses within distance k, track the max.
Clarify the problem constraints (grid size, number of houses, k) and discuss the brute-force approach of checking every cell and counting houses within Manhattan distance k. Then optimize using a rotated coordinate system (u = x+y, v = x-y) to transform the Manhattan distance condition into a square range query, enabling efficient counting with prefix sums or a sliding window.
Pro tip: Mention that the rotated coordinates convert the diamond-shaped Manhattan ball into an axis-aligned square, which allows using 2D prefix sums for O(1) range queries after O(RC) preprocessing. This demonstrates deep algorithmic insight and is a common trick in competitive programming.
Ask about grid dimensions, number of houses, value of k, and whether the turret can be placed on a house. Discuss edge cases like k=0, no houses, or k larger than grid dimensions.
For each cell, iterate over all houses and count those with Manhattan distance ≤ k. Complexity O((RC) * H). Explain this is simple but may be too slow for large inputs.
Transform each house (x, y) to (u = x+y, v = x-y). The Manhattan distance condition becomes max(|u-u0|, |v-v0|) ≤ k, i.e., a square in (u,v) space. Then for each possible turret position (also transformed), count houses in that square.
Build a 2D prefix sum array over the transformed grid (size up to (R+C) x (R+C)). For each cell, compute the number of houses in the square [u-k, u+k] x [v-k, v+k] in O(1) time. Track the maximum.
Time: O(RC + (R+C)^2) preprocessing and O(RC) queries. Space: O((R+C)^2). Compare with brute-force and discuss when each is preferable.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.