← Microsoft Interview Insights
I started with clarifying questions about what 'similar' means, which felt smart at the time, but I think I spent too long on that part.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then outline a high-level architecture that separates offline model training from online serving. Focus on feature engineering for home similarity, candidate generation, and ranking, and discuss trade-offs between different similarity metrics and scalability approaches.
Pro tip: Emphasize how you would handle cold-start for new listings and incorporate user feedback loops to continuously improve recommendations, showing product sense beyond pure technical design.
Ask questions to understand scale (number of homes, users, QPS), latency requirements, and what 'similar' means (location, price, features, photos). Define success metrics like click-through rate or user engagement.
Propose a two-phase system: offline pipeline for feature extraction and model training, and online serving for real-time recommendations. Include components like data ingestion, feature store, candidate generation, ranking, and caching.
Discuss features: structured (price, beds, baths, sqft, location), unstructured (text descriptions, images). Explain similarity metrics (cosine, Euclidean) and how to combine them, possibly using embeddings from neural networks.
Describe how to efficiently retrieve top-N similar homes (e.g., using approximate nearest neighbor search like FAISS, or geo-based indexing). Then rank candidates using a machine learning model that incorporates user behavior and context.
Address scaling to millions of listings (sharding, distributed processing), trade-offs between accuracy and latency, and offline/online evaluation (A/B testing, metrics). Mention handling cold-start and feedback loops.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.