← Anthropic Interview Insights
I started with chunking and content-addressable storage because that felt like the core insight, hash the chunks, deduplicate by hash, done.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then present a high-level architecture with clear separation of ingestion, chunking, indexing, storage, and metadata. Walk through the write and read paths, emphasizing idempotency, consistency, and fault isolation. Finally, cover operational aspects like backfills, compaction, sharding, deployment, monitoring, and cost controls, tying each to production readiness.
Pro tip: Anchor your design around content-addressable storage and idempotent operations—this simplifies deduplication, consistency, and recovery. Explicitly call out trade-offs (e.g., strong vs. eventual consistency) and justify your choices based on the use case.
Ask about data volume, file sizes, deduplication scope (global vs. per-tenant), latency/throughput SLOs, consistency needs, and compliance constraints. This shapes all subsequent design decisions.
Sketch the main components: ingestion service, chunker, index (e.g., hash-based), blob storage, metadata store, and API gateway. Explain how they interact and the data flow.
Detail the write path: client uploads file, service chunks it, computes hashes, checks index for duplicates, stores unique chunks, and updates metadata. For reads: client requests file, service retrieves metadata, fetches chunks, and reassembles. Emphasize idempotency and consistency.
Cover backfills (e.g., re-chunking existing data), compaction/GC (removing unreferenced chunks), index sharding and rebalancing, deployment/rollback strategies, schema migration, monitoring/SLOs, capacity planning, cost controls, and privacy/compliance.
Explain fault isolation (e.g., bulkheads, circuit breakers), failure recovery (retries, idempotent operations, dead-letter queues), disaster recovery (multi-region replication, backups), and how to protect production from degradation (rate limiting, load shedding, canary deployments).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.