I knew the brute force immediately, merge them, find the middle, done.
Use binary search on the smaller array to find a partition point that divides both arrays into left and right halves of equal size (or differing by one). The median is then computed from the max of the left half and min of the right half. This achieves O(log(min(m,n))) time, which is within O(log(m+n)).
Pro tip: Always clarify edge cases like empty arrays and ensure your partition logic handles odd/even total lengths correctly. Mention that you choose the smaller array for binary search to optimize time and simplify boundary conditions.
Confirm the problem details: arrays are sorted, median definition for even/odd total length, and constraints. State that you'll aim for O(log(min(m,n))) time.
Explain that you'll partition both arrays such that the left half contains elements all ≤ right half, and the left half size is (m+n+1)/2. Use binary search on the smaller array to find the correct partition.
Describe the binary search: for a partition index i in array A, compute j = (m+n+1)/2 - i in array B. Check if A[i-1] ≤ B[j] and B[j-1] ≤ A[i]. Adjust search bounds accordingly.
Once correct partition found, if total length is odd, median is max(left half). If even, median is average of max(left half) and min(right half). Handle edge cases with sentinels for out-of-bounds.
State time complexity O(log(min(m,n))) and space O(1). Mention handling empty arrays, single-element arrays, and all elements of one array smaller than the other.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.