The example they give is 1800 with max 700 and the answer is three chunks of 600 each, not two chunks of 700 and one of 400.
First, compute the minimum number of chunks k as ceil(total / maxChunk). Then distribute the total as evenly as possible across k chunks: each chunk gets floor(total / k), and the first (total mod k) chunks get one extra. This guarantees all chunks are positive integers, none exceed maxChunk, and sizes differ by at most 1.
Pro tip: Mention that this is a classic greedy distribution problem and that the near-uniform split is optimal for minimizing the maximum chunk size, which is often a hidden goal in real systems like load balancing or data partitioning.
Clarify that chunks must be positive integers, no chunk exceeds maxChunk, and we need the minimum number of chunks. Also note the tie-breaking rule: if multiple splits have the same minimum chunk count, return the most uniform one.
Calculate k = ceil(total / maxChunk). This is the theoretical minimum because each chunk can hold at most maxChunk, so fewer chunks would be impossible.
Set base = total // k and remainder = total % k. Assign base to every chunk, then add 1 to the first remainder chunks. This ensures sizes differ by at most 1 and all are positive.
Check that base + 1 <= maxChunk (which holds because k = ceil(total/maxChunk)) and that all chunks are >= 1. Handle edge cases like total = 0 (return empty list) or maxChunk = 0 (invalid input).
The algorithm runs in O(k) time and O(k) space for the output. Discuss that this is optimal since we must output k chunks. Mention that the uniform distribution minimizes the maximum chunk size, which is beneficial for parallel processing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.