The implicit AND part is what tripped me up first.
Start by clarifying the grammar and edge cases, then outline a recursive descent parser that builds an AST. After parsing, collect variables, evaluate the expression for all assignments, and print the truth table in a clear format.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a recursive descent parser because it naturally handles operator precedence and parentheses, and it's easy to extend. Also, discuss how to handle edge cases like empty expressions or invalid syntax gracefully.
Ask about operator precedence, associativity, and how to handle invalid input. Confirm the output format and whether variables should be sorted alphabetically.
Outline a recursive descent parser with functions for expression, term, and factor to handle OR, implicit AND, NOT, and parentheses. Consider using a tokenizer to ignore spaces.
Construct an abstract syntax tree (AST) from the parsed tokens. Then, recursively evaluate the AST for each variable assignment.
Extract distinct variables, sort them, and iterate over all 2^n combinations. For each, evaluate the expression and format the row with variable values and the result.
Test with various expressions, including edge cases. Discuss potential optimizations like memoization or iterative evaluation for large n.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
They pushed pretty hard on edge cases after I had the main solution.
Start by outlining a standard parsing strategy such as recursive descent or a stack-based approach, then explicitly discuss how you handle edge cases like unmatched parentheses, unknown symbols, and empty input. Emphasize error detection and recovery, and tie your approach to the specific expression language's grammar.
Pro tip: Demonstrate maturity by discussing not just error detection but also error recovery and user-friendly error messages, and mention how you would test edge cases with unit tests.
Briefly describe the expression language's grammar (e.g., arithmetic expressions with parentheses) to set context for parsing decisions.
Explain your chosen approach (e.g., recursive descent, shunting-yard, or stack-based) and justify why it suits the grammar and requirements.
Detail how you detect and handle unmatched parentheses, unknown symbols, and empty input, including error reporting and recovery.
Explain how you might recover from errors to continue parsing or provide meaningful feedback, rather than just failing.
Mention how you would test the parser, including unit tests for edge cases and possibly fuzz testing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.