← Two Sigma Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just brute-force the whole thing since n is capped at 15, which is tiny.
First, clarify the problem and constraints (e.g., string length, character set) to ensure alignment. Then, discuss a brute-force approach and its complexity, followed by an optimized strategy using a set to deduplicate and sorting at the end. Emphasize correctness and efficiency trade-offs.
Pro tip: Mention that the total number of subsequences across all deletions is O(n * 2^n), so deduplication is crucial; using a hash set avoids redundant storage and sorting can be done once at the end.
Confirm the problem details: string length, character set, whether empty subsequences are excluded, and expected output format. This ensures you solve the right problem.
Describe generating all n strings by deleting one character, then for each, enumerate all non-empty subsequences. Analyze time and space complexity: O(n * 2^n) subsequences.
Use a hash set to collect subsequences, automatically removing duplicates. Discuss potential memory concerns and whether streaming or trie-based approaches could help.
Convert the set to a list and sort lexicographically. If needed, discuss sorting complexity O(m log m) where m is the number of unique subsequences.
Walk through a small example (e.g., 'abc') to verify the approach, and consider edge cases like empty string or repeated characters.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.