This is the kind of question where you can spiral fast if you don't anchor on mission first.
Start by defining a clear mission for Facebook Dating that aligns with Meta's broader goal of fostering meaningful connections. Then, outline a hierarchy of goals (e.g., user acquisition, engagement, retention) and corresponding metrics (e.g., matches per user, conversation rate, DAU/MAU) that measure success at each stage. Finally, tie the metrics back to the mission and consider potential trade-offs or ethical implications.
Pro tip: Emphasize that success isn't just about matches but about meaningful relationships formed, and suggest tracking long-term retention of couples as a north-star metric. Also, mention the importance of privacy and safety as foundational to trust in a dating product.
Craft a concise mission statement that captures the purpose of Facebook Dating, such as 'to help people find meaningful relationships within their existing social graph.' Ensure it aligns with Meta's overall mission of bringing people together.
Break down the mission into actionable goals: user acquisition (sign-ups), activation (profile completion, first match), engagement (messages sent, matches per user), retention (weekly active users, repeat usage), and outcome (relationships formed).
For each goal, choose specific, measurable metrics. For example: DAU/MAU for engagement, match rate for activation, conversation rate for engagement, and 30-day retention for retention. Consider a north-star metric like 'number of meaningful conversations per week.'
Prioritize metrics based on the product stage (early-stage focus on acquisition and activation; later-stage on retention and outcomes). Balance growth metrics with quality metrics (e.g., report rate, safety incidents) to avoid harmful trade-offs.
Explain how the metrics ladder up to the mission. Suggest a process for regularly reviewing metrics and iterating on the product to ensure long-term success and alignment with user needs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.