The scheme they wanted was length-prefix plus a separator, so something like '3foo#3lis#4jljl#' for ['foo','lis','jljl'].
Clarify the encoding format: for each string, write its length as a decimal number, then a delimiter (e.g., '#'), then the string itself. For decoding, parse the length, skip the delimiter, and extract exactly that many characters. Emphasize that the length prefix makes the encoding unambiguous even if strings contain the delimiter.
Pro tip: Mention that using a length prefix avoids delimiter collision issues, and discuss how this approach scales to large lists and arbitrary string content. Also, consider edge cases like empty strings and Unicode characters.
Ask about the expected input size, character set (ASCII vs Unicode), and whether the encoded string must be human-readable. Confirm that the delimiter is not part of the length representation.
For each string, output its length in decimal, followed by a delimiter (e.g., '#'), then the string. Concatenate all encoded strings. Example: ['ab', 'c'] -> '2#ab1#c'.
Iterate over the list, for each string compute its length, convert to string, and append length + delimiter + string to a result list. Finally, join the list into a single string.
Use an index pointer to traverse the encoded string. At each step, read characters until the delimiter to get the length, skip the delimiter, then extract that many characters as the next string. Repeat until the end.
Test with empty list, empty strings, strings containing the delimiter, and multi-digit lengths. Ensure the decoded list matches the original exactly.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.