I started with the pipeline architecture itself and almost forgot to anchor everything back to GDPR requirements until maybe five minutes in.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a high-level architecture that separates personal data into a dedicated, access-controlled store with encryption and tokenization. Walk through the lifecycle: consent capture, data processing with purpose limitation, deletion via crypto-shredding or cascading deletes, and audit logging. Emphasize trade-offs between compliance, performance, and cost, and how you'd validate the design.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness that GDPR compliance is not just technical but also organizational—mention data protection impact assessments (DPIAs), records of processing, and the role of a Data Protection Officer. Also, highlight that you'd design for deletion from the start rather than bolting it on later.
Ask about data types, user scale, retention policies, and regulatory specifics (e.g., GDPR, CCPA). Confirm non-functional requirements like latency, availability, and audit granularity.
Propose isolating personal data in a dedicated store with encryption at rest and in transit, tokenization/pseudonymization, and strict IAM. Use separate keys per user for crypto-shredding.
Design a consent service that records user consent with timestamps, purpose, and version. Enforce consent checks at data ingestion and processing points, and allow easy withdrawal.
Build APIs for access and deletion requests. For deletion, use crypto-shredding (delete encryption keys) or cascading deletes across derived data. Ensure portability by exporting data in a common format.
Log all access and modifications to personal data in an immutable audit log. Implement monitoring and alerts for anomalous access, and regularly test deletion and consent flows.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.