The filtering and aggregation part was fine, GROUP BY user_id, ORDER BY order_cnt DESC, LIMIT 5, done.
First, clarify the tie-breaking rule with the interviewer, then propose a deterministic method such as adding a secondary sort key (e.g., customer_id or earliest order date) to ensure exactly 5 rows. Alternatively, discuss using window functions like RANK or DENSE_RANK and explain the trade-offs of each approach.
Pro tip: Always state your tie-breaking assumption explicitly and ask if the business prefers a specific rule (e.g., most recent order, highest revenue). This shows you understand that ambiguous requirements can lead to inconsistent results in production.
Ask the interviewer whether ties should be broken arbitrarily, by a secondary metric, or if all tied customers should be included (which may exceed 5). This ensures alignment before writing any SQL.
Write a subquery or CTE that selects only customers who meet the campaign conditions (e.g., signed up in a date range, made a purchase, etc.).
Aggregate the transactions table to get the total order count for each qualifying customer, using GROUP BY customer_id and COUNT(DISTINCT order_id) or similar.
Use a window function (ROW_NUMBER, RANK, or DENSE_RANK) ordered by total order count descending, and optionally a tie-breaker. Then filter to rank <= 5.
Describe why you chose a particular ranking function and tie-breaker, and discuss the implications (e.g., ROW_NUMBER gives exactly 5, RANK may give more if ties).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.