The deduplication part is what got me initially.
Start by clarifying the schema and defining the cold delivery condition precisely, then outline a SQL query that joins orders, deliveries, and complaints, deduplicates orders, and aggregates daily metrics for the last 7 days. Emphasize the importance of handling edge cases like time zones, missing data, and ensuring each order is counted once.
Pro tip: Mention that you would validate the cold rate by checking a few sample orders manually and consider the business impact of false positives/negatives. Also, discuss how you might monitor this metric over time and investigate anomalies.
Ask questions to confirm the definition of 'cold' (temperature threshold, complaint window), the time zone for daily aggregation, and the exact tables/columns available. Ensure you understand how orders, deliveries, and complaints relate.
Plan a SQL query that joins orders to deliveries and complaints, flags cold deliveries based on temperature or complaint, and deduplicates orders using a CASE or DISTINCT. Use a subquery or CTE to isolate the last 7 days.
Ensure each order is counted once by using a flag per order (e.g., MAX of cold condition) and then aggregate by date to compute delivered_orders, cold_deliveries, and cold_rate. Round the rate to 3 decimals.
Sanity-check the output: verify counts, look for anomalies, and consider edge cases like orders with no delivery or complaints outside the window. Discuss how to present the metric to stakeholders.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Start by defining the cold delivery rate as the proportion of delivered orders that were cold, then build a date spine for each restaurant covering the full week to ensure zero-delivery days appear. Use a window function to compute a 7-day rolling sum of cold orders and total delivered orders, handling division by zero to return NULL when there are no deliveries.
Pro tip: Clarify with the interviewer whether the rolling window should be based on calendar days or the last 7 days with data; in most business contexts, calendar days are expected, and zero-delivery days should be included as zeros in the numerator and denominator, not skipped.
Cold delivery rate = cold delivered orders / total delivered orders. Confirm that 'cold' is a status flag and that the denominator includes all delivered orders, not just cold ones.
Generate a row for every restaurant and every date in the range 2025-08-26 to 2025-09-01, even if there were no deliveries. Left join the aggregated daily delivery data to this spine.
For each restaurant and date, compute total delivered orders and cold delivered orders. Ensure zero-delivery days have 0 for both counts.
Use a window function to sum cold orders and total orders over the current date and the preceding 6 days, partitioned by restaurant and ordered by date.
Divide the rolling cold sum by the rolling total sum. Use NULLIF or a CASE statement to return NULL when the denominator is zero, ensuring zero-delivery days show delivered_orders=0 and rate=NULL.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Straightforward once the previous CTE was built.
First, clarify the definition of the 7-day rolling cold rate and the tie-breaking rule. Then, write a SQL query that computes the rolling cold rate for each restaurant as of 2025-09-01, ranks them using DENSE_RANK() ordered by cold rate ascending and total delivered orders descending, and finally filters to the top 3 ranks.
Pro tip: Mention that you would validate the rolling window calculation by checking a few restaurants manually, and discuss how you'd handle edge cases like restaurants with no orders in the window.
Confirm what 'cold rate' means (e.g., percentage of orders delivered cold) and how the 7-day rolling window is defined (e.g., including the current date, using order date). Also confirm that 'total delivered orders' refers to the same 7-day window.
Use a window function to calculate the 7-day rolling cold rate and total delivered orders for each restaurant as of 2025-09-01. Ensure you handle date ranges correctly and aggregate per restaurant.
Use DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY cold_rate ASC, total_delivered_orders DESC) to rank restaurants. This ensures that ties in cold rate are broken by higher total delivered orders, and the next rank is not skipped.
Filter the ranked results to only include rows where rank <= 3, and return the restaurant name, delivered orders, cold rate, and rank. Order the final output by rank for readability.
Mention potential edge cases such as restaurants with no orders in the window (cold rate undefined) and how you would handle them (e.g., exclude or treat as 0). Also, discuss performance considerations for large datasets.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
First, compute each courier's 7-day cold delivery rate and delivery count using a windowed aggregation over the last 7 days. Then, calculate the population mean and standard deviation of those rates across all couriers, and flag couriers whose z-score exceeds +2. Finally, return the required fields for flagged couriers.
Pro tip: When using window functions, ensure you're computing the population standard deviation (STDDEV_POP) over the courier-level rates, not the raw delivery-level data. Also, consider setting a minimum delivery threshold to avoid flagging couriers with very few deliveries, as their rates can be noisy.
Filter deliveries to the last 7 days and compute each courier's total deliveries and cold deliveries. Then calculate the cold delivery rate as cold_deliveries / total_deliveries.
Using the courier-level cold rates, calculate the population mean and population standard deviation (STDDEV_POP) across all couriers.
For each courier, compute the z-score as (cold_rate - mean) / stddev. Flag couriers where z-score > 2.
Select courier_id, deliveries in the period, cold_rate, and z-score for the flagged couriers.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.