← Capital One Interview Insights
The case-insensitive match tripped me up first.
Break the problem into two stages: first, aggregate observations to the country-date level to determine if each day is sunny and filter out all-NULL days; then compute per-country metrics and apply the ranking logic. Use conditional aggregation and window functions to handle the tie-breaking and limit to one row.
Pro tip: Explicitly state your assumptions about NULL handling and case-insensitivity, and mention that you would validate the query against edge cases like countries with exactly 5 days or ties. This shows attention to detail and data quality.
Exclude rows where condition is NULL, and treat 'Sunny' case-insensitively (e.g., using LOWER(condition) = 'sunny'). This ensures only valid observations are considered.
Group by country and date, and determine if the day is sunny using MAX(CASE WHEN condition = 'Sunny' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END). This flags a day as sunny if any observation meets the condition.
Group by country, count total observed days (all non-NULL days) and sunny days, then calculate the probability as sunny_days / total_days. Filter to countries with at least 5 total days.
Order by probability descending, then total_days descending, then country_name ascending, and limit to 1 row. Round the probability to 3 decimal places.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.