I got the basic aggregation down pretty fast but fumbled a bit explaining when DENSE_RANK actually matters versus RANK.
Start by clarifying the schema and business rules (e.g., how revenue is defined, what counts as a cancelled order, and how to handle nulls). Then write a SQL query that joins the necessary tables, filters to active merchants and non-cancelled orders within the time window, aggregates revenue per merchant, and uses a window function to rank merchants. Finally, select the top 5 ranks and explain the implications of using RANK vs DENSE_RANK vs LIMIT.
Pro tip: Mention that you would validate the query with edge cases like ties, nulls, and cancelled orders, and discuss how the choice of ranking function affects the result set size and business interpretation.
Ask about the exact table columns, how revenue is calculated (e.g., order total minus discounts), what defines an active merchant, and how cancelled orders are represented. Confirm the time window boundaries and whether to include nulls.
Join merchant, menu, order, and dasher tables as needed (likely merchant to order via menu or directly). Filter to active merchants, orders within the time window, and exclude cancelled orders. Handle nulls appropriately (e.g., COALESCE for revenue). Group by merchant and sum revenue.
Use RANK() or DENSE_RANK() over (ORDER BY total_revenue DESC) to assign ranks. Explain that RANK leaves gaps after ties while DENSE_RANK does not, and choose based on whether you want exactly 5 merchants or top 5 ranks.
Filter to rank <= 5 (or dense_rank <= 5) and select merchant_id, merchant_name, total_revenue, and rank. Order by rank for readability.
Compare using window functions vs LIMIT 5: LIMIT 5 may cut off ties arbitrarily and doesn't provide rank numbers. Explain how nulls and cancelled orders are handled and any assumptions made.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.