← Pinterest Interview Insights
The part I fumbled on first was the negative scores.
Start by clarifying that negative scores cannot be used directly as probabilities, so you need a transformation like shifting or exponentiating. Then explain the sampling algorithm (e.g., cumulative distribution or alias method) and emphasize numerical stability techniques such as subtracting the maximum score before exponentiation.
Pro tip: Mention that if all scores are negative, shifting by the minimum makes them non-negative, but be aware that this changes relative weights; alternatively, use softmax with a temperature parameter to control sharpness. Also, note that for large lists, the alias method gives O(1) sampling after O(n) preprocessing.
Confirm that scores can be negative and that we need to sample proportionally. Discuss whether the scores are logits or arbitrary real values, as this affects the transformation.
Use a shift (subtract min) or exponentiation (softmax) to ensure all weights are positive. Explain the trade-offs: shifting preserves relative differences but can be dominated by outliers; softmax with temperature controls the distribution.
For softmax, subtract the maximum score before exponentiating to avoid overflow/underflow. For shifting, ensure the shift doesn't cause underflow when scores are very negative.
Describe either the cumulative distribution function (CDF) method with binary search (O(n) preprocessing, O(log n) per sample) or the alias method (O(n) preprocessing, O(1) per sample).
Address cases like all scores equal, all negative, or very large lists. Mention time and space complexity and potential alternatives like rejection sampling.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.