Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a high-level architecture that separates control plane (orchestration, persistence, collaboration) from data plane (workspaces, terminals, language servers). Dive into each component, emphasizing trade-offs around latency, cost, and isolation, and conclude with a discussion of failure modes and monitoring.
Pro tip: Focus on the cost and latency implications of idle workspaces: propose a tiered hibernation strategy (e.g., pause containers, snapshot to object storage) and explain how you'd measure and optimize cold-start times. This shows you understand real-world constraints beyond just functional design.
Ask about expected number of concurrent users, workspace size, latency targets, budget constraints, and security/compliance needs. This scopes the design and highlights key trade-offs.
Sketch a control plane (API gateway, orchestrator, metadata DB, collaboration service) and data plane (workspace containers, persistent volumes, terminal/LSP proxies). Explain how they interact.
Detail provisioning (container orchestration, image caching), persistence (network volumes vs. object storage sync), collaboration (CRDT/OT, WebSocket), terminal/LSP multiplexing (session management, protocol translation), and sandboxing (gVisor, seccomp).
Describe strategies for detecting idle workspaces, hibernating (pause containers, snapshot to S3), and resuming quickly. Discuss trade-offs between cost and cold-start latency.
Summarize key trade-offs (e.g., consistency vs. latency, isolation vs. performance), discuss failure scenarios (node failure, network partition), and outline monitoring/alerting for SLOs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.