← Capital One Interview Insights
The row operations were fine, reversing and swapping are pretty mechanical.
Clarify the command format and edge cases, then design a solution that processes commands sequentially, mutating the matrix in place when possible. For each command, implement the operation efficiently, paying attention to row/column indices and matrix dimensions after rotation.
Pro tip: Discuss the trade-offs between in-place operations and creating new matrices, and mention how you would test with edge cases like 1x1 matrices or empty commands.
Ask about the command format, matrix dimensions, and whether the matrix should be modified in place or a new matrix returned. Confirm edge cases like empty commands or invalid indices.
Decide on representation (e.g., list of lists) and implement helper functions for each command: reverse row, swap rows, and rotate 90 degrees clockwise.
Iterate through the command list, applying each operation to the current matrix state. Ensure that after rotation, subsequent commands refer to the new dimensions.
Check for invalid row indices, empty matrices, and commands that might not apply (e.g., swapping rows when only one row exists). Test with small examples.
Discuss time and space complexity of each operation and overall. Consider optimizations like lazy rotation or using transpose and reverse for rotation.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.