← Hudson River Trading Interview Insights
I started with the naive all-pairs approach and they immediately asked about input size, which was their way of telling me to think harder.
Clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose an efficient algorithm using a trie or sorting to find the maximum common prefix length. Discuss trade-offs between time and space complexity, and consider optimizations like early termination.
Pro tip: Mention that converting integers to strings can be avoided by comparing digits arithmetically, which saves memory and time, especially for large arrays.
Confirm that the common prefix is based on the decimal string representation, and discuss constraints like array sizes and integer ranges.
Acknowledge that comparing all pairs is O(N*M*L) and may be too slow, but it's a starting point for small inputs.
Suggest building a trie from one array's strings and querying with the other, or sorting both arrays and using binary search for prefix lengths.
Compare time and space of trie vs. sorting, noting that trie uses O(total characters) space while sorting is in-place but O(N log N + M log M).
Discuss empty arrays, single-element arrays, and integers with different digit lengths, ensuring the algorithm returns 0 when no common prefix exists.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.