← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Data Scientist·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

Senior
Jul 2026

Summary

Meta DS interview with a meaty experimentation question about a TikTok-style video feed feature. Just one question but it had a lot of moving parts and I felt like I was still talking when they were ready to move on.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design an A/B test to evaluate a new short-video feed feature. Walk through your choice of experiment unit, randomization strategy, primary and secondary metrics, sample size estimation, guardrail metrics, and how you'd handle novelty effects and seasonality. How would you decide when to call the test?

A/B Testing & ExperimentationProduct Analytics & Metrics
Author's notes

This question looks like a standard experiment design prompt until you realize how many layers they actually want you to cover.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the product goal and the specific hypothesis for the short-video feed feature, then systematically walk through each experimental design component (unit, randomization, metrics, sample size, guardrails). Emphasize trade-offs and practical considerations like novelty and seasonality, and conclude with a clear decision framework for calling the test.

Pro tip: Meta often uses cluster randomization (e.g., by user or by social graph) to avoid interference in feed experiments; mention this and discuss how you'd measure and mitigate network effects. Also, propose a pre-registered analysis plan with sequential testing or a fixed horizon to avoid peeking and p-hacking.

1. Define Hypothesis and Success Criteria

Articulate a clear, testable hypothesis (e.g., short-video feed increases engagement) and define what success looks like in terms of primary and secondary metrics. Align with stakeholders on the minimum detectable effect (MDE) and business impact.

2. Choose Experiment Unit and Randomization

Decide on the randomization unit (e.g., user, session, or cluster) based on interference risk and metric sensitivity. For Meta, user-level randomization is common, but consider cluster randomization if social spillover is a concern. Ensure proper randomization and balance checks.

3. Select Metrics and Estimate Sample Size

Identify primary (e.g., time spent, video views) and secondary metrics (e.g., shares, comments), plus guardrail metrics (e.g., user reports, unfollows). Use power analysis to estimate required sample size and duration, accounting for variance and MDE.

4. Address Novelty and Seasonality

Plan for novelty effects by running the test long enough to observe stabilization and analyzing early vs. late periods. Mitigate seasonality by using a control group, considering holdout periods, or using techniques like CUPED to adjust for pre-experiment trends.

5. Decide When to Call the Test

Pre-define stopping rules: either a fixed horizon based on power analysis or sequential testing with alpha spending. Monitor guardrails continuously and stop early if harm is detected. At the end, analyze results with appropriate statistical tests and consider practical significance.

Key Points to Mention

  • Randomization unit: user-level vs. cluster randomization to handle network effects
  • Primary metric: e.g., time spent or video views; secondary: engagement actions; guardrails: user reports, unfollows, retention
  • Sample size calculation: power analysis, MDE, variance, and duration
  • Novelty effect: run test for multiple weeks, analyze trend over time, use holdout groups
  • Seasonality: use control group, consider time-based confounders, apply CUPED or other variance reduction
  • Decision framework: pre-registered analysis plan, sequential testing or fixed horizon, guardrail monitoring, and practical significance

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.