← Snowflake Interview Insights
I jumped straight to DFS and felt pretty good about it, but then realized mid-explanation I wasn't handling the case where X is the root cleanly.
Clarify that the tree is rooted and that removing X means detaching the entire subtree rooted at X. Then compute the height of the remaining tree by finding the maximum depth of all nodes except those in X's subtree, which can be done with a single DFS/BFS while skipping X's subtree.
Pro tip: Mention that if X is the root, the remaining tree is empty and height is typically defined as -1 or 0; state your assumption explicitly and ask the interviewer to confirm.
Confirm that the tree is rooted, that removing X includes its entire subtree, and how height is defined for an empty tree. Discuss edge cases like X being the root or a leaf.
Decide between DFS (recursive or iterative) and BFS. DFS is natural for computing heights, but BFS can also work by tracking levels.
Traverse the tree from the root, but when you encounter X, do not recurse into it. Track the maximum depth reached among all other nodes.
If X is the root, return the defined height for an empty tree (e.g., -1 or 0). If X is not found, the height is the original tree height.
State that the time complexity is O(n) and space is O(h) for DFS or O(n) for BFS. Walk through a small example to verify correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.