I started by just using an integer index as the cursor which felt almost too simple, and the interviewer kept pushing on whether that was enough.
Clarify the cursor design first: it should encode the index of the first item on the current page, enabling O(1) access and O(pageSize) slicing. Then implement each method by computing the start index from the cursor, slicing the array within bounds, and returning the page along with new cursors for next and previous pages. Handle edge cases by checking array bounds and returning empty pages or null cursors when at the ends.
Pro tip: Define the cursor as the index of the first item on the page, not the last, to simplify both forward and backward navigation and avoid off-by-one errors. Also, explicitly state that you assume the array is static; if it can change, you'd need a more robust cursor like a unique ID or timestamp.
Confirm that the array is sorted and static, and that the cursor is an opaque token. Discuss whether the cursor should be index-based or value-based, and how to handle concurrent modifications if any.
Choose a cursor representation that allows O(1) access to the page start. For a static array, using the index of the first item is simple and efficient. Explain how this supports both forward and backward navigation.
Return the first page by slicing the array from index 0 to min(pageSize, array length). Provide a next cursor if there are more items, and a prev cursor as null.
For getNextPage, use the cursor to get the start index, then slice from start to start+pageSize. For getPrevPage, compute the new start as max(0, start - pageSize) and slice accordingly. Return appropriate cursors for further navigation.
Check for boundaries: if start >= array length, return empty page; if start < 0, clamp to 0. Ensure each method runs in O(pageSize) time due to slicing, and O(1) extra space. Discuss partial last pages and empty arrays.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.