← Databricks Interview Insights
Started fine with the hashmap plus doubly-linked list combo for LRU, but the concurrency part is where I started fumbling.
Start by clarifying requirements (read/write ratio, latency, durability guarantees, memory constraints) and then design the core in-memory cache using a hash map and doubly linked list for O(1) Get/Put/Delete with LRU eviction. Discuss optional durability by considering write-ahead logging or snapshotting, and evaluate trade-offs between performance, consistency, and recovery time.
Pro tip: Emphasize that durability is optional and should be configurable; propose a pluggable persistence layer (e.g., WAL for write-heavy or snapshots for read-heavy) and discuss how to handle cache warm-up after restart to avoid thundering herd.
Ask about expected throughput, latency, memory limits, durability needs, and consistency requirements to scope the design appropriately.
Propose a hash map for O(1) key lookup and a doubly linked list to track access order, enabling O(1) LRU eviction and updates.
Explain how to evict the least recently used item when capacity is reached, and discuss thread-safety using fine-grained locking or lock-free techniques.
Describe persistence options like write-ahead logging (WAL) or periodic snapshots, and how to recover state on restart while balancing performance and durability.
Compare durability approaches, eviction policies, and concurrency models; mention potential optimizations like segmented LRU or TTL support.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.