I started with BFS because it felt more natural for level-order stuff, and that part went fine.
Start by clarifying the definition of left/right view and edge cases, then present both BFS and DFS solutions with clear code and complexity analysis. Emphasize the trade-offs between the two approaches and how they can be adapted to variations.
Pro tip: Mention that the left view can be obtained by swapping left and right children in the DFS traversal, and highlight that BFS naturally handles level boundaries while DFS uses depth tracking—this shows deep understanding.
Confirm that left/right view means the first/last node at each level from left to right. Discuss edge cases: empty tree, single node, skewed tree.
Use a queue to process nodes level by level. For each level, record the first node (left view) and last node (right view).
Traverse recursively, passing depth. For left view, visit left child first; for right view, visit right child first. Record the first node seen at each depth.
Both approaches visit each node once: O(n) time. Space: BFS O(w) where w is max width; DFS O(h) for recursion stack, where h is height.
Compare BFS (intuitive, level-based) vs DFS (less memory for skewed trees, easy to modify for variations). Mention iterative vs recursive DFS.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.