← Atlassian Interview Insights
This was a lot to hold in your head at once.
Start by clarifying requirements (throughput, latency, data quality rules, ordering needs) and then propose a high-level architecture using a distributed log (e.g., Kafka) for ingestion, a stream processor (e.g., Flink) for real-time filtering, and a rules engine with versioned rules stored in a database. Walk through each component, emphasizing trade-offs around exactly-once, ordering, and scalability, and conclude with how rules are updated and versioned without downtime.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of operational concerns by discussing how to handle rule updates atomically and how to monitor data quality metrics; mention that you'd use a canary deployment for new rules to avoid widespread data loss.
Ask questions to understand expected throughput, latency tolerance, data quality rule complexity, ordering requirements, and fault tolerance needs. This ensures the design meets the actual use case.
Propose a scalable ingestion layer using a distributed message queue like Kafka, which handles high throughput, provides durability, and decouples producers from consumers.
Use a stream processing framework (e.g., Flink, Spark Streaming) to consume events, evaluate configurable rules, and filter out bad data. Discuss how rules are represented (e.g., DSL, SQL) and evaluated efficiently.
Explain partitioning for scalability, checkpointing/state management for fault tolerance, and mechanisms for exactly-once processing (e.g., idempotent writes, transactions). Discuss ordering guarantees per partition and how to handle out-of-order events.
Describe how rules are stored (e.g., in a versioned database), how updates are propagated to the stream processor (e.g., via a control stream), and how to ensure consistency during rule changes (e.g., atomic swaps, versioned rule sets).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.