← Microsoft Interview Insights
The naive approach of scanning all k heads at each step is O(N*k) and they basically told you upfront that wasn't acceptable.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose using a min-heap to efficiently merge the arrays. Explain the algorithm step-by-step, analyze its time and space complexity, and finally implement it in code.
Pro tip: Mention that if k is very large compared to N, a divide-and-conquer approach (merging pairs of arrays) can be more cache-friendly and avoid heap overhead, but the heap solution is generally optimal for arbitrary k.
Ask about constraints: Are the arrays sorted ascending? What is the range of k and N? Can we assume non-null arrays? This shows attention to detail.
Explain that a min-heap of size k, storing the current element from each array, allows us to repeatedly extract the minimum and insert the next element from the same array.
State that each of the N elements is inserted and extracted once, each operation O(log k), giving O(N log k) time. Space is O(k) for the heap plus O(N) for the output.
Write clean code, handling edge cases like empty arrays. Use a priority queue (min-heap) and track the array index and element index for each entry.
Walk through a small example, then mention alternative approaches (e.g., divide-and-conquer) and when they might be preferable.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.