← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round focused on building a word prediction system from scratch, with two follow-ups that pushed into probability and time complexity optimization. Pretty meaty for a single problem.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Design a word prediction system: write a training function that takes a list of sentences and tracks which words follow each word, then write a predictor function that takes a word and returns the most likely next word.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

The core problem wasn't bad.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then outline a simple frequency-based approach using a hash map. Discuss how to handle ties, unseen words, and scalability, and finally provide clean code for training and prediction.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of real-world complexities by mentioning smoothing techniques (e.g., add-one smoothing) and how to extend to n-grams, showing you think beyond the basic solution.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Ask about input size, whether to consider case sensitivity, punctuation, and how to handle unseen words or ties. Confirm the expected output format.

2. Design data structures

Propose using a hash map (dictionary) where each key is a word and the value is another hash map mapping next words to their frequencies. This allows efficient updates and lookups.

3. Implement training function

Iterate through each sentence, tokenize into words, and for each adjacent pair, increment the count of the next word in the inner map for the current word.

4. Implement predictor function

For a given word, look up its inner map and return the next word with the highest frequency. Handle cases where the word is not in the map or has no successors.

5. Discuss optimizations and extensions

Mention time/space complexity, potential improvements like using a heap for top-k predictions, and extensions to n-grams or smoothing for better generalization.

Key Points to Mention

  • Use of hash maps for O(1) average-case lookup and update during training.
  • Handling ties by choosing any or the first encountered, or by using a deterministic rule.
  • Edge cases: empty input, single-word sentences, unseen words, and words with no successors.
  • Time complexity: O(N) for training where N is total number of words, and O(V) for prediction where V is vocabulary size of successors.
  • Space complexity: O(U) where U is number of unique word pairs.
  • Possible extensions: n-gram models, smoothing techniques (e.g., Laplace smoothing), and using a trie for memory efficiency.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Follow-up: how would you optimize the predictor function to return the most likely next word in O(1) time instead of O(k)?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

I blanked for a second.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify that the O(k) cost comes from scanning k candidate next words to find the maximum probability. Then propose precomputing a data structure—such as a max-heap or sorted list—per context so the top candidate is always at the front, enabling O(1) retrieval. Discuss trade-offs like update cost and memory overhead, and mention that O(1) is achievable if the context is fixed and the distribution is static or updated infrequently.

Pro tip: Emphasize that O(1) lookup requires O(k) preprocessing or update time, so the real trade-off is between query latency and update cost—this shows you understand system design, not just algorithms.

1. Identify the bottleneck

Explain that the current O(k) comes from linearly scanning all k possible next words to find the one with the highest probability. This is the operation we need to eliminate.

2. Precompute the answer

For each context, store the most likely next word (and its probability) in a hash map or dictionary. Then lookup is O(1) because it's a direct key access.

3. Handle updates and ties

If the model updates, recompute the top word for affected contexts. For ties, define a deterministic tie-breaking rule (e.g., alphabetical or random) and store it.

4. Discuss trade-offs

Precomputing uses extra memory (O(number of contexts)) and updates become O(k) per context. If updates are frequent, consider a heap or balanced tree for O(log k) updates while keeping O(1) peek.

5. Consider alternatives

Mention that if k is small, O(k) might be fine; but for large k or latency-critical systems, precomputation is worth it. Also note that approximate methods (e.g., caching top-N) can reduce cost.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map from context to top next word (O(1) lookup)
  • Precomputation cost: O(k) per context, done offline or on update
  • Memory trade-off: storing top word per context vs. full distribution
  • Update strategy: recompute on model change or use incremental data structures
  • Tie-breaking and handling of unseen contexts (fallback to O(k) or default)
  • Amortized analysis: if queries >> updates, O(1) amortized is achievable

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Second follow-up: modify the predictor to return a word sampled according to probability rather than always returning the top word. For example, 'I' should return 'am' 2/3 of the time and 'like' 1/3 of the time.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This one was actually fun.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Explain that you need to convert the model's raw scores into a probability distribution using softmax, then sample from that distribution. Discuss how to implement sampling efficiently, such as using cumulative distribution function (CDF) and binary search, and mention trade-offs like temperature scaling for controlling randomness.

Pro tip: Mention that sampling introduces nondeterminism, so for reproducibility you should allow setting a random seed. Also, note that in production you might want to cache the CDF or use alias tables for O(1) sampling when the vocabulary is large.

1. Convert scores to probabilities

Apply softmax to the model's output logits to obtain a valid probability distribution over the vocabulary. Ensure numerical stability by subtracting the max logit before exponentiation.

2. Build cumulative distribution

Compute the cumulative sum of the probabilities to create a CDF array. This allows mapping a uniform random number to a word index.

3. Sample from distribution

Generate a random number between 0 and 1, then find the first index where the CDF exceeds this value. This can be done via linear scan or binary search for efficiency.

4. Handle edge cases and optimizations

Address cases like zero probabilities, floating-point precision, and large vocabularies. Consider optimizations like precomputing the CDF or using alias sampling for O(1) time.

5. Discuss trade-offs and extensions

Talk about how temperature affects the distribution, the impact on text generation quality, and potential need for reproducibility via random seeds.

Key Points to Mention

  • Softmax function and numerical stability (subtracting max logit)
  • Cumulative distribution function (CDF) and inverse transform sampling
  • Binary search for efficient sampling from CDF
  • Temperature scaling to control randomness
  • Reproducibility via random seed
  • Time and space complexity trade-offs (e.g., O(V) vs O(log V) per sample)

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.