I kept wanting to jump into edge cases before I even had the happy path written, which burned time.
Start by clarifying the interfaces of the three APIs and the expected behavior of the loop. Then outline a stateful loop that maintains a prompt/context, calls the LLM, parses the output to decide between tool execution and final answer, and repeats until max steps or final answer. Emphasize termination conditions, context accumulation, and error handling.
Pro tip: Mention that you would log each step's input/output for debugging and observability, and discuss how to handle parsing failures or tool errors gracefully—this shows production maturity beyond just coding the happy path.
Ask about the exact signatures of the LLM call, parser, and tool executor, and confirm the expected output format (e.g., JSON with action and action_input). Clarify max_steps and whether the final answer should be returned or just detected.
Outline a for-loop up to max_steps. In each iteration, call the LLM with the current prompt, parse the output, and branch: if final answer, return it; else execute the tool and append the result to the prompt.
Explain how to build the prompt by concatenating the initial question, previous thoughts/actions/observations, and the latest tool result. Mention token limits and potential truncation strategies.
Describe early termination when a final answer is parsed, and what to do if max steps are reached (e.g., return a failure message). Also cover handling parse errors or tool execution failures by adding error observations to the prompt.
Talk about trade-offs like step limit vs. cost, prompt length vs. context retention, and potential improvements such as caching, parallel tool calls, or adding a fallback mechanism.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.