The open-endedness is the whole point and also the hardest part.
Start by clarifying requirements and defining a generic pagination interface that separates concerns between data source and pagination strategy. Then walk through the class design, explaining how different strategies (offset, cursor) handle edge cases like out-of-range pages and data mutations, and discuss trade-offs.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and consistency: for financial data, cursor-based pagination with stable sort keys prevents duplicates or missed records when data changes mid-traversal. Mention that you'd validate page size limits and return clear error codes for out-of-range requests.
Ask about expected data volume, mutation frequency, consistency needs, and client capabilities (e.g., support for cursors). This shapes the choice of pagination strategy.
Design a generic Paginator interface with methods like getPage(cursor, pageSize) and a PageResult containing items, nextCursor, and totalCount (if available). Separate data fetching from pagination logic.
Create concrete strategies: OffsetPaginator (simple but unstable under mutations) and CursorPaginator (stable using sort keys). Explain how each handles out-of-range pages (e.g., return empty page or error) and data changes.
Define behavior for invalid cursors, page size limits, and concurrent modifications. For cursor-based, use opaque cursors encoding sort key and direction; for offset, document that results may shift.
Compare strategies on performance, consistency, and complexity. Mention how to add caching, total count estimation, or bidirectional pagination without breaking the interface.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.