I jumped straight into the feed ranking logic because it felt impressive, but that backfired.
Start by clarifying functional and non-functional requirements, then estimate scale (users, QPS, storage). Propose a high-level architecture covering core services, data models, and APIs, and dive into 1-2 deep areas like feed generation or search. Discuss trade-offs and how you'd evolve the design.
Pro tip: Meta values product sense and scale: tie technical decisions to user impact and growth, and proactively discuss trade-offs (e.g., consistency vs. availability) and how you'd measure success.
Ask about core features (Q&A, voting, comments, feed, search, notifications), scale (DAU, QPS, data size), and non-functional needs (latency, availability, consistency).
Estimate read/write QPS, storage for questions/answers, and bandwidth. Use numbers to justify design choices like sharding or caching.
Sketch architecture: client, API gateway, services (user, question, answer, feed, search, notification), data stores (SQL/NoSQL, cache, search index), and message queue.
Define schemas for users, questions, answers, votes, comments, and relationships. Outline key APIs (e.g., POST /question, GET /feed).
Pick 1-2 areas (e.g., feed generation, search ranking, consistency) and discuss algorithms, scaling, and trade-offs. Mention monitoring and iteration.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.