I started by reaching for a basic map from role to a list of jobs and sorting on the fly, which the interviewer let me finish before asking what happens at scale.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a data model that maps roles to eligible jobs and maintains a sorted structure for fast top-K retrieval. Discuss trade-offs between different data structures and explain how you would handle updates and queries efficiently.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a heap or balanced BST per role to keep jobs sorted by salary, enabling O(log n) insertions and O(k log n) top-K queries, but also consider if a simple sorted list with binary search is sufficient for the expected scale.
Ask about expected scale (number of users, jobs, roles), read/write ratio, and whether salaries can be updated or deleted. This determines the optimal data structures.
Propose storing jobs in a global collection and maintaining per-role indexes. For each role, keep a data structure that supports efficient insertion and top-K queries.
For each role, use a max-heap or a balanced binary search tree (e.g., TreeMap) to store jobs sorted by salary. Alternatively, use a sorted list with binary search for insertion and retrieve top K by taking the last K elements.
Compare time complexities: heap gives O(log n) insert and O(k log n) for top-K (by extracting k times), while balanced BST gives O(log n) insert and O(k) for top-K via reverse iteration. Discuss space trade-offs.
Consider how to handle salary updates (requires removal and re-insertion) and deletions. Discuss concurrency and persistence if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.