I went straight to BFS for connected components which was fine, but the bounding box part slowed me down.
Clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose a BFS/DFS solution that traverses each cell once, tracking visited cells and updating bounding box coordinates for each connected component. Finally, convert the bounding box coordinates to the required column-letter/row-number format.
Pro tip: Discuss how to handle very large matrices by streaming rows or using union-find, and mention the trade-offs between BFS and DFS in terms of memory and recursion depth.
Ask about matrix size, memory limits, and whether the matrix is static or dynamic. Confirm the coordinate format and that regions are maximal (cannot be extended).
Select BFS or DFS for 4-directional connectivity. BFS is iterative and avoids recursion limits; DFS is simpler but may risk stack overflow on large regions.
Use a visited set or modify the matrix in-place. For each unvisited '1', start a traversal, updating min/max row and column indices for the current region.
Convert the bounding box's top-left and bottom-right coordinates to column-letter/row-number format (e.g., A2). Ensure correct handling of multi-letter columns (e.g., AA).
State time complexity O(N) where N is total cells, and space complexity O(N) for visited set or O(1) if in-place. Discuss trade-offs between BFS/DFS and potential optimizations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.