← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Meta SWE coding round, pretty focused on arrays and selection algorithms. One main problem but the follow-up is where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given an unsorted array and an integer k, find the k-th largest element. What's your approach, and how would you handle it if the data is too large to fit in memory?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Got the Quick Select part out reasonably well, average O(n) and all that.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., memory limits, data types, whether k is 1-indexed). Then present the optimal in-memory solution using Quickselect (average O(n)) or a min-heap of size k (O(n log k)), discussing trade-offs. For out-of-memory data, propose external sorting or a distributed approach like MapReduce with per-partition top-k heaps, followed by a final merge.

Pro tip: Mention that Quickselect has O(n^2) worst-case, but you can use Median of Medians for guaranteed O(n) or randomize pivot to avoid worst-case. For large data, emphasize that you can't sort the whole dataset, so you need to process in chunks and merge results.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about data size, memory limits, k value, duplicates, and whether the array can be modified. This shows you think about edge cases before coding.

2. Present in-memory solutions

Describe Quickselect (partition-based) and min-heap approaches, including time/space complexity and when to use each. Mention that Quickselect is average O(n) but worst-case O(n^2), while heap is O(n log k).

3. Address out-of-memory scenario

Explain that you cannot load all data, so you need external algorithms. Propose chunking the data, computing top-k per chunk, and merging the results. Alternatively, use a distributed system like MapReduce.

4. Discuss trade-offs and optimizations

Compare approaches: Quickselect is faster but modifies input and has worst-case; heap is stable and works for streaming. For large data, external sorting is O(n log n) but simpler; distributed top-k is more scalable but complex.

5. Summarize and conclude

Reiterate the chosen approach based on constraints, and mention potential follow-ups like handling duplicates or finding k-th smallest.

Key Points to Mention

  • Quickselect algorithm with partitioning (like quicksort) and its average O(n) time complexity
  • Min-heap of size k for O(n log k) time and O(k) space, suitable for streaming data
  • Worst-case O(n^2) of Quickselect and how to mitigate with random pivot or Median of Medians
  • External sorting or chunk-based processing for data too large for memory
  • MapReduce paradigm: map each chunk to local top-k, then reduce to global top-k
  • Trade-offs between time complexity, space complexity, and implementation complexity

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.