This one messed with me more than I expected.
Start by clarifying the system architecture and data flow for the recommendation section, then systematically narrow down the failure point using the AI assistant to inspect one file at a time. Prioritize high-signal files (entry points, API contracts, error handling) and verify each hypothesis with targeted checks before moving on.
Pro tip: Treat the AI assistant as a focused pair programmer: give it precise questions about each file's role and expected behavior, and always validate its suggestions against the actual runtime behavior or logs. This shows you can leverage tools without blindly trusting them.
Ask clarifying questions about the tech stack, how the recommendation section is rendered, and what 'not displaying' means (blank, error, missing data). Identify the expected data flow from backend to frontend.
Based on the data flow, list likely failure points (API endpoint, data fetching logic, component rendering, state management). Rank files by probability and impact to decide which to analyze first with the AI assistant.
For each file, ask the AI to summarize its purpose, identify potential bugs related to the recommendation feature, and suggest specific checks. Use the AI's output to refine your hypotheses and decide the next file.
Once a suspicious file is identified, confirm the bug by tracing the logic or simulating the failure. Propose a minimal fix that addresses the root cause without introducing regressions, and explain how you would test it.
Summarize the root cause, the fix, and any follow-up actions (e.g., adding tests, monitoring). Discuss how you would prevent similar issues in the future.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.