My first instinct was to just run a BFS for every query independently.
Sort the queries and process them in increasing order, maintaining a union-find structure of cells whose values are below the current threshold. As the threshold increases, activate cells that become eligible and union them with already active neighbors, then the answer for each query is the size of the component containing the top-left cell. Map the answers back to the original query order.
Pro tip: Mention that this offline approach reduces the time complexity to O(MN log(MN) + Q log Q) and handles large inputs efficiently, which is crucial for Uber's scale. Also, clarify that if the top-left cell's value is not less than the query, the answer is 0.
Clarify that movement is only through cells with values strictly less than the query, and that we need to count reachable cells from (0,0). Discuss potential constraints to choose the right algorithm.
Sort queries in ascending order and process them incrementally, activating cells as the threshold increases. This avoids recomputing reachability for each query.
Sort all cells by value. For each query, activate all cells with value less than the query and union them with already active neighbors. Track the size of the component containing the top-left cell.
Store the answer for each query in a map keyed by the query value or index, then output in the original query order.
Discuss time and space complexity, and handle edge cases like empty matrix, queries smaller than the top-left cell's value, and duplicate queries.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.