The alphabetical prioritization was the part I kept second-guessing myself on.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a high-level architecture with a frontier, deduplication, rate limiter, and prioritization logic. Dive into the letter-based prioritization algorithm and discuss trade-offs, failure handling, and scalability considerations.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of politeness and legal compliance when crawling Wikipedia, and suggest using a token bucket rate limiter with configurable rates per domain. Also, mention that the letter prioritization can be implemented with a priority queue where each URL's priority is based on whether its starting letter is unvisited.
Ask about scale (number of pages, rate limits), politeness policies, and whether the crawler should be distributed. Confirm that the goal is to cover all 26 letters as quickly as possible.
Outline components: URL frontier (priority queue), deduplication (Bloom filter or set), rate limiter (token bucket), HTML parser, and link extractor. Discuss single-machine vs distributed.
Explain how to track visited letters and assign priority: URLs with unvisited starting letters get higher priority. Use a set or Bloom filter for deduplication, and handle collisions.
Describe a token bucket rate limiter with configurable rate. Handle HTTP errors (retries with backoff), timeouts, and malformed pages. Ensure the crawler is polite and respects robots.txt.
Compare in-memory vs disk-based frontier, exact vs approximate deduplication, and single vs distributed crawling. Mention monitoring and metrics.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.