← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jun 2026

Summary

Meta SWE interview with a string manipulation problem that had a few layers to it. The core question was straightforward enough but the follow-ups on Unicode and case-insensitivity are where things got more interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a priority string P of distinct characters and a text string S, reorder S so that characters appearing in P come first (grouped in P's order), followed by any remaining characters in their original relative order. Design a solution that runs in O(|P| + |S|) time, explain your space usage, and discuss how you'd extend it to handle Unicode and case-insensitive comparisons.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The base problem clicked pretty fast.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem and constraints, then propose a counting-based solution: count frequencies of each character in S, output characters in P's order using the counts, then output remaining characters in original order. Analyze time and space complexity, and discuss extensions for Unicode and case-insensitivity by normalizing keys and using appropriate data structures.

Pro tip: Mention that the counting approach avoids sorting and achieves linear time, but for Unicode, a hash map is more practical than a fixed array; also note that case-insensitive comparison requires a consistent normalization strategy (e.g., case folding) and careful handling of distinct characters that map to the same key.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Confirm that P contains distinct characters, S may contain any characters, and the output must preserve the relative order of characters not in P. Ask about input size, character set, and whether in-place modification is required.

2. Design the algorithm

Use a frequency map (or array for ASCII) to count occurrences of each character in S. Then iterate through P, appending each character repeated by its count. Finally, iterate through S again, appending characters not in P in their original order.

3. Analyze complexity

Time: O(|P| + |S|) because we make two passes over S and one over P. Space: O(|S|) for the output and O(k) for the frequency map, where k is the number of distinct characters (bounded by min(|S|, alphabet size)).

4. Discuss extensions for Unicode and case-insensitivity

For Unicode, use a hash map keyed by code point or grapheme cluster. For case-insensitive, normalize both P and S to a canonical form (e.g., lowercase or casefold) before counting, but preserve original characters in output. Note that case folding may map multiple characters to one, requiring careful handling.

5. Consider edge cases and trade-offs

Handle empty P or S, characters in P not present in S, and characters in S not in P. Discuss whether to modify in-place (if allowed) or use extra space, and the impact of Unicode normalization on performance.

Key Points to Mention

  • Linear time complexity achieved by counting instead of sorting.
  • Space usage: O(|S|) for output, O(k) for frequency map; can be O(1) if alphabet is fixed and small.
  • Preservation of relative order for characters not in P by iterating S in original order.
  • Unicode handling: use code points or grapheme clusters; hash map for sparse alphabets.
  • Case-insensitive comparison: normalize keys (e.g., casefold) but output original characters.
  • Potential pitfalls: assuming ASCII, ignoring multi-character graphemes, or incorrect normalization.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.