We spent a good chunk of time just talking through the tradeoffs before any code.
Start by clarifying the problem and constraints, then compare Quick Select with alternatives like sorting or heap-based selection. Explain pivot strategies and their trade-offs, then implement a clean, efficient solution with careful partitioning and edge-case handling.
Pro tip: Mention that while Quick Select has O(n) average time, its worst-case O(n²) can be avoided with randomized pivots or Median of Medians, but in practice randomized pivots are preferred for simplicity and speed. Also, discuss how to handle duplicates (e.g., three-way partitioning) to avoid worst-case behavior on repeated elements.
Ask about input size, data types, whether the array can be modified, and if duplicates are allowed. Confirm the expected time/space complexity and if worst-case guarantees are needed.
Compare sorting (O(n log n)), heap-based selection (O(n log k)), and Quick Select (O(n) average). Highlight Quick Select's in-place nature and average-case efficiency.
Cover first/last element, random pivot, median-of-three, and Median of Medians. Discuss their impact on performance and worst-case guarantees.
Write code for a chosen method (e.g., randomized pivot) with a partition function. Handle edge cases like k out of bounds, empty array, and duplicates.
State average O(n) and worst-case O(n²) time, O(1) space. Walk through an example and discuss potential optimizations like three-way partitioning.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.