Classic problem, I knew it, but I fumbled a bit on the in-place splicing part.
Use a two-pointer technique with a dummy head to iteratively compare the current nodes of both lists, splicing the smaller node into the merged list. Handle edge cases like empty lists and ensure the remaining nodes are appended efficiently.
Pro tip: Emphasize that this solution runs in O(n+m) time with O(1) extra space by reusing nodes, and mention that it's the core of merge sort's merge step, showing you understand its broader applications.
Ask clarifying questions about input (e.g., sorted ascending, possible null lists) and output (e.g., return head of merged list). Confirm that splicing means reusing nodes, not creating new ones.
Explain the two-pointer strategy with a dummy head to simplify edge cases. Outline that you'll compare nodes and advance pointers until one list is exhausted.
Trace through a simple example (e.g., 1->3->5 and 2->4->6) to demonstrate the step-by-step merging and pointer updates.
Write clean code with a dummy node, a current pointer, and a while loop. After the loop, attach the remaining non-null list.
State time O(n+m) and space O(1). Discuss edge cases: one or both lists empty, lists of different lengths, and duplicate values.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.