There's a lot of surface area here and I think I spread myself too thin early on.
Start by clarifying functional and non-functional requirements, then estimate scale (e.g., daily uploads, views, storage) to drive design decisions. Propose a high-level architecture covering upload, transcoding, storage, CDN, and metadata, then dive deep into 2-3 critical components like video processing pipeline or recommendation system. Discuss trade-offs (e.g., consistency vs. availability, cost vs. latency) and justify choices.
Pro tip: Emphasize how you'd handle the unique challenges of video at scale—like adaptive bitrate streaming, efficient transcoding, and CDN edge caching—and tie them back to user experience metrics (e.g., startup time, rebuffering).
Ask clarifying questions to define scope: core features (upload, view, search, recommendations), scale (DAU, uploads/day, storage), and non-functional needs (latency, availability, consistency).
Estimate key metrics: daily active users, uploads per day, average video size, storage growth, bandwidth, and QPS for reads/writes. Use these to inform component sizing and technology choices.
Sketch the end-to-end architecture: client uploads to object storage, transcoding service processes videos into multiple resolutions, metadata stored in a database, and content served via CDN with adaptive bitrate streaming.
Pick 2-3 areas to detail: e.g., video transcoding pipeline (parallel processing, job queue), storage tiering (hot vs. cold), CDN strategy (edge caching, geo-distribution), or recommendation system (collaborative filtering, real-time updates).
Discuss trade-offs (e.g., strong vs. eventual consistency for view counts, cost of transcoding vs. quality), identify bottlenecks (e.g., transcoding queue, database hotspots), and propose mitigations (e.g., sharding, caching, rate limiting).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.