← Anthropic Interview Insights
The parsing part is what trips people up first.
Clarify the input format and constraints, then design a solution that parses the directory strings into a file tree, computes a hash for each file's content, and groups files by their hash. Discuss trade-offs between hashing and direct comparison, and consider scalability for large datasets.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a cryptographic hash like SHA-256 to minimize collision risk, but also discuss how to handle collisions by verifying with actual content comparison. This shows depth and awareness of real-world edge cases.
Ask questions to understand the exact format of the directory strings, how files and contents are encoded, and what the expected output structure is. Confirm edge cases like empty files or duplicate paths.
Design a parser to extract file paths and contents from the strings, building a data structure (e.g., a map from file path to content) that represents all files.
For each file, compute a hash (e.g., SHA-256) of its content. Use a hash map to group file paths by their hash value.
For each hash group, if there are multiple files, verify that contents are truly identical by comparing them directly (or by using a collision-resistant hash). Then output groups of identical files.
Discuss time and space complexity: O(N) for hashing, where N is total content size. Consider optimizations like streaming large files or using a rolling hash for incremental updates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.