My first instinct was brute force with hashing and the interviewer basically shut that down immediately.
First, clarify the problem: the file is a sequence of bytes (or characters), and we need the shortest string not present as a contiguous substring. The key insight is that the answer is at most O(log n) in length, so we can use a sliding window and a hash set to check all substrings of increasing length until we find one missing. For a 4GB file, we must consider memory and I/O constraints, so we should discuss streaming and external algorithms.
Pro tip: Mention that the answer is bounded by the logarithm of the file size (base alphabet size), so we only need to check a few lengths, and that a Bloom filter or external sorting can handle the memory constraints.
Confirm the alphabet (e.g., bytes, ASCII), whether the file is static, and the definition of 'substring'. Discuss memory limits and whether we can use external storage.
Show that the minimum missing substring length is at most ceil(log_A(n)) + 1, where A is the alphabet size and n is the file length. For a 4GB file with byte alphabet (A=256), this is at most 5.
For each length L from 1 upward, scan the file and insert all substrings of length L into a hash set (or use a rolling hash). If the set size is less than A^L, a missing substring exists. Return the first L where this happens.
For large L, the number of substrings may exceed memory. Propose using external sorting, Bloom filters, or a trie on disk. Alternatively, use a probabilistic approach with Bloom filters to detect missing substrings with high probability.
Compare time vs. space: rolling hash reduces memory but has collisions; external sorting is exact but slower. Mention that for L=1, we can use a 256-bit bitmap, and for L=2, a 65536-bit bitmap, etc.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.