Went with a hashmap for the dictionary and a forward scan at each position, which felt right.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., dictionary size, text length, character set) and then describe a straightforward greedy algorithm that at each position tries to match the longest possible token. Discuss how to efficiently find the longest match, such as using a trie or sorting tokens by length, and analyze time/space complexity. Finally, mention edge cases and potential trade-offs.
Pro tip: Mention that while greedy longest-match is simple, it may not always be optimal for all tokenization tasks; however, it's often used in practice for speed and simplicity. Also, consider using a trie to avoid repeatedly scanning the dictionary.
Ask about the size of the dictionary, the length of the text, the character set (e.g., ASCII vs Unicode), and whether the dictionary is static or dynamic. This helps determine the appropriate data structure and algorithm.
At each position, iterate over possible token lengths from longest to shortest (or use a trie to find the longest match) and check if the substring exists in the dictionary. If a match is found, output its ID and advance by the token length; otherwise, output the character and advance by one.
Build a trie from the dictionary to efficiently find the longest matching token starting at a given position. Traverse the trie character by character until no further match is possible, keeping track of the last node that corresponds to a valid token.
Discuss time complexity: O(N * L) where N is text length and L is max token length, or O(N * L) with trie traversal. Space complexity: O(D) for the trie, where D is total characters in dictionary. Handle empty text, empty dictionary, and tokens that are prefixes of others.
Compare greedy longest-match with other tokenization methods (e.g., BPE, WordPiece) and note that greedy may not always produce the optimal segmentation. Mention that for some applications, a more sophisticated approach might be needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.