I started with the 2D approach out of habit and the interviewer stopped me pretty quickly to say it would OOM.
First, explain the OOM issue with the 2D DP and propose reducing space to O(N) by using a 1D array that represents the current row. Then, describe the update rule and emphasize that iterating right-to-left is crucial to avoid overwriting values needed for the current row's computation. Finally, justify the time complexity remains O(N^2) and discuss trade-offs.
Pro tip: Mention that the right-to-left update is a common pattern in DP space optimization, and relate it to the 0/1 knapsack problem to show broader understanding.
Explain that the 2D DP array causes O(N^2) space, leading to out-of-memory for large N. State the goal: reduce space to O(N).
Introduce using a 1D array dp of size N+1, where dp[j] represents the current row's j-th element. Initialize dp[0] = 1 and update in place.
Show that for each row i from 1 to N, we update dp[j] = dp[j] + dp[j-1] for j from i down to 1. This uses the previous row's values stored in dp[j] and dp[j-1].
Emphasize that updating left-to-right would overwrite dp[j-1] before it's used for dp[j], causing incorrect results. Right-to-left preserves the previous row's values.
State that time complexity remains O(N^2) and space is O(N). Discuss that this is optimal for space without changing time, and mention potential edge cases.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.