← Microsoft Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just do a recursive DFS and return the node when I found either p or q.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., whether it's a binary search tree, if parent pointers exist, and if nodes are guaranteed to be present). Then present a recursive solution that traverses the tree, returning the node if it matches p or q, and otherwise combining results from left and right subtrees. Analyze time and space complexity, and discuss iterative alternatives or optimizations.
Pro tip: Mention edge cases like when p or q is the root, or when one is an ancestor of the other, and explain how your solution handles them. Also, briefly discuss how the approach changes if the tree is a BST or if parent pointers are available, showing adaptability.
Ask about assumptions: Is it a binary search tree? Are parent pointers available? Are p and q guaranteed to be in the tree? This shows attention to detail.
Explain that you'll traverse the tree, and at each node, check if it's p or q. Recursively search left and right subtrees, and use the results to determine the LCA.
Base case: if node is null or matches p or q, return node. Recursive case: if both left and right return non-null, current node is LCA; otherwise return the non-null child.
State that time complexity is O(n) in the worst case, and space complexity is O(h) due to recursion stack, where h is tree height.
Cover cases like p or q being the root, or one being ancestor of the other. Mention iterative solutions using parent pointers or path-to-root if applicable.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.