Started with a hashmap plus doubly linked list, which is the obvious path, and they pushed pretty quickly on eviction edge cases and thread safety.
Start by clarifying requirements (capacity, operations, thread-safety) and then propose a design using a hash map and a doubly linked list to achieve O(1) time for both get and put. Walk through the implementation details, discuss trade-offs, and consider edge cases and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a doubly linked list with sentinel nodes to simplify edge cases, and discuss how you would handle concurrency if needed (e.g., using locks or a concurrent data structure). This shows attention to detail and production readiness.
Ask about expected capacity, operations (get, put), thread-safety, and performance requirements. Confirm that O(1) time complexity is desired.
Propose a hash map for O(1) access to cache entries and a doubly linked list to maintain usage order. Explain how they work together.
Describe how get and put work: on get, move the accessed item to the front (most recently used); on put, add new item to front and evict the least recently used (tail) if capacity exceeded.
Discuss edge cases like updating existing keys, capacity of 1, and thread-safety. Mention possible optimizations like using sentinel nodes or a custom linked list.
State that both operations are O(1) time and O(capacity) space. Discuss trade-offs between different implementations (e.g., using OrderedDict in Python vs. manual implementation).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.