Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then present a layered architecture with a clear public API and pluggable type handlers. Walk through the loading pipeline from request to completion, covering concurrency, caching, and failure handling, and justify trade-offs at each layer.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the loader should be a generic framework with type-specific plugins, and that observability and failure isolation are first-class concerns, not afterthoughts. This shows you think about production readiness and extensibility.
Ask about expected scale, latency SLAs, resource types, and deployment environment to tailor the design. Confirm whether the loader is client-side, server-side, or both, and what dependencies exist.
Design a simple, async API (e.g., load(resourceId, options)) and a plugin interface for type handlers. Explain how new types are registered and how the loader remains agnostic to resource specifics.
Describe the end-to-end flow: request deduplication, prioritization, batching, dependency resolution, and streaming. Cover how concurrency is managed and how retries and timeouts are applied.
Detail a two-tier cache (memory and disk) with appropriate eviction policies (e.g., LRU, TTL). Explain cache key design, invalidation, and how caching interacts with deduplication and streaming.
Discuss failure isolation (e.g., bulkheads, circuit breakers), thread safety, and metrics/logging/tracing. Explain how to monitor cache hit rates, load latencies, and error rates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
The brokered vs brokerless comparison is where I had the most to say, which was kind of backwards since it came at the end.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a high-level architecture that addresses all listed aspects. Compare brokered vs brokerless and federated topologies, justify your choice based on trade-offs, and dive into key components like QoS, discovery, and fault tolerance. Conclude with how your design meets Roblox's scale and real-time needs.
Pro tip: Anchor your design around a concrete use case (e.g., real-time game telemetry) to make trade-offs tangible, and explicitly state assumptions about scale, latency, and failure models to show senior-level thinking.
Ask about scale (nodes, messages/sec), latency targets, reliability needs, and deployment environment. Define assumptions to scope the design.
Propose a brokered, brokerless, or federated design. Compare trade-offs (e.g., simplicity vs. latency, central point of failure vs. discovery complexity) and justify your pick.
Detail topic definitions, message schema/serialization, service discovery, QoS modes, ordering, durability/replay, backpressure, and handling slow/disconnected subscribers.
Explain partitioning, scaling across nodes, clock sync, latency constraints, and fault tolerance mechanisms (replication, failover, heartbeats).
Cover authentication, authorization, encryption, and secure discovery. Summarize how the design meets requirements and note potential improvements.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.