I went straight to storing the endpoint coordinates and checking against them during the marking step, which worked fine.
First, clarify that the current solution overwrites start and end markers during traversal. Then, propose modifying the marking logic to check if a cell is the start or end before marking, or alternatively, record the start and end positions and reapply their markers after traversal. Finally, discuss the trade-offs of each approach in terms of code simplicity and performance.
Pro tip: Mention that preserving markers is a common requirement in visualization and debugging, and that a clean solution often involves separating traversal logic from rendering logic. This shows you think about maintainability and separation of concerns.
Explain that the current traversal marks all visited cells with '*', including the start and end, which overwrites their original markers.
Decide between conditional marking (skip marking if cell is start or end) or post-processing (reapply markers after traversal). Consider code clarity and performance.
Modify the marking step to check if the current cell is the start or end; if so, do not overwrite its marker. This avoids extra passes.
After traversal, set the start and end cells back to their original markers. This is simpler if traversal logic is complex.
Compare approaches: conditional marking is efficient but adds a check per cell; post-processing is simpler but requires storing positions and an extra pass.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.