← Salesforce Interview Insights

Salesforce·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
May 2026

Summary

Salesforce software engineer interview with a dynamic programming problem that sits at an interesting intersection of subsequence and substring logic. Not the hardest problem I've seen but the hybrid constraint tripped me up at first.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given two strings x and y, find the maximum length of a string s that is both a subsequence of x and a contiguous substring of y.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

The substring constraint is what makes this non-trivial.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify that we need the longest string that is a subsequence of x and a substring of y. Then propose an efficient algorithm, such as iterating over all substrings of y and checking if each is a subsequence of x, or using dynamic programming to compute the longest common subsequence between x and each substring of y. Analyze time and space complexity, and discuss possible optimizations.

Pro tip: Start by confirming the definitions of subsequence and substring, and ask about constraints (e.g., string lengths) to tailor your solution. Mention that a brute-force approach is O(n^3) but can be improved with DP or binary search on length, showing you think about scalability.

1. Clarify the problem

Restate the problem in your own words and confirm edge cases (e.g., empty strings, no common characters). Ask about input size constraints to determine the required efficiency.

2. Discuss brute-force approach

Explain that you could generate all substrings of y and check each as a subsequence of x, which takes O(m^2 * n) time. This establishes a baseline and shows you understand the naive solution.

3. Propose an optimized algorithm

Suggest using dynamic programming: for each starting position in y, compute the longest prefix that is a subsequence of x, or use binary search on the answer length with a greedy check. Aim for O(n*m) or O(n*m log m) time.

4. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

Compare the time and space complexity of your approach with alternatives. Discuss whether preprocessing x (e.g., next occurrence arrays) can speed up subsequence checks.

5. Test with examples

Walk through a small example (e.g., x='abcde', y='ace') to verify correctness and explain how the algorithm would find the maximum length.

Key Points to Mention

  • Definition of subsequence vs. substring
  • Brute-force approach and its O(n*m^2) complexity
  • Dynamic programming solution (e.g., LCS with each substring of y)
  • Optimization using next occurrence arrays for O(1) subsequence checks
  • Binary search on the length of s with a greedy feasibility check
  • Edge cases: empty strings, no common characters, repeated characters

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.